Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • REC Home
  • Apply
    • REC Services Rate Card & Policies
    • LPFM Construction Completed
    • LPFM License Modification
    • New FM Booster Station
    • New Class D FM Station in Alaska
    • New Low Power FM (LPFM) Station
  • Initiatives
    • RM-11846: Rural NCE Stations
    • RM-11909: LP-250 / Simple 250
    • WIDE-FM
    • RM-11952: Translator Reform
    • RM-11843: 8 Meter Ham Band
    • PACE - LPFM Compliance
  • Services
  • Tools
    • Today's FCC Activity
    • Broadcast Data Query
    • Field strength curves
    • Runway slope
    • Tower finder
    • FM MODEL-RF Exposure Study
    • More tools
    • Developers - API
  • LPFM
    • Learn about LPFM
      • Basics of LPFM
      • Self Inspection Checklist
      • Underwriting Compliance Guide
      • Frequently Asked Questions
      • FCC Rules for LPFM
      • HD Radio for LPFM
      • Transmitters certified for LPFM
      • Interference from FM translators
      • RadioDNS for LPFM Stations
    • 2023 Window REC Client Portal
    • myLPFM - LPFM Station Management
    • LPFM Station Directory
    • Spare call signs
    • REC PACE Program
    • More about LPFM
  • Reference
    • Pending FCC Applications
    • FCC Filing Fees
    • Radio License Renewal Deadlines
    • FCC Record/FCC Reports
    • Pirate Radio Enforcement Data
    • Premises Info System (PREMIS)
    • ITU and other international documents
    • Recent FCC Callsign Activity
    • FCC Enforcement Actions
    • Federal Register
    • Recent CAP/Weather Alerts
    • Legal Unlicensed Broadcasting
    • More reference tools
  • LPFM Window
  • About
    • REC in the Media
    • Supporting REC's Efforts
    • Recommendations
    • FCC Filings and Presentations
    • Our Jingles
    • REC Radio History Project
    • Delmarva FM / Riverton Radio Project
    • J1 Radio / Japanese Broadcasting
    • Japan Earthquake Data
    • REC Systems Status
    • eLMS: Enhanced LMS Data Project
    • Open Data at REC
    • Our Objectives
  • Contact

Breadcrumb

  • Home

Operational Status

Michi on YouTube

Most popular

fcc.today - real time updates on application activity from the FCC Media Bureau.  fccdata.org - the internet's most comprehensive FCC database lookup tool.  myLPFM.com - Low Power FM channel search and station management tool.  REC Broadcast Services - professional LPFM and FM translator filing services. 

Other tools & info

  • Filing Window Tracking
  • Enforcement Actions
  • REC Advisory Letters
  • FAQ-Knowledge Base
  • U/D Ratio Calculator
  • Propagation Curves
  • Runway Slope/REC TOWAIR
  • Coordinate Conversion
  • PREMIS: Address Profile
  • Spare Call Sign List
  • FCC (commercial) filing fees
  • Class D FM stations in Alaska
  • ARRR: Pirate radio notices
  • Unlicensed broadcasting (part 15)
  • FMmap - broadcast atlas
  • Federal Register
  • Rate Card & Policies
  • REC system status
  • Server Status
  • Complete site index
Cirrus Streaming - Radio Streaming Services - Podcasting & On-demand - Mobile Apps - Advertising

Statement of REC Networks: KJVA-LP vs. KHSH-LP decision

By admin | 12:20 PM EST, Tue November 29, 2016
KJVA vs. KHSH

I am very disappointed by the Audio Division's decision on the Petition for Reconsideration filed by Vida Abundante, the licensee of first-generation LPFM station KJVA-LP, San Bernardino, CA regarding interference by second-generation station KHSH-LP, Redlands.  Instead of thinking outside the box and running some simple contours (like I did below), the Bureau fell back on a regulation that has been rarely applied in the broadcast context and dismissed the petition because it did not contain some kind of engineering affadavit. 

This again brings into issue our "one-size fits all" nature of LPFM. A service that does not take into consideration that the earth is not flat and that terrain exists.  The problem here is because LPFM uses the same 8 radial height above average terrain concept that full-power stations use to determine station class.  Because of this, a station located on a lower elevation with a valley on one site and a mountain range on the other side is going to get a HAAT below 30 meters and thus 100 watts.  This is because the higher HAAT readings towards the valley and the lower HAAT readings towards the mountains average out.  This is what results in these huge lobes in what I refer to in RM-11749 (the LP-250 petition) as "the foothill effect".   For FM translators not being used for fill-in, the FCC uses a "maximum HAAT" rule where for non-directional antennas, they look at the HAAT individually on each of the 12 radials and use the highest HAAT in each radial to determine the ERP for the station.   Here's what each station would look like:

KJVA-LP (radial/HAAT)
0 -521
30 - 659
60 -394
90 -122
120 224
150 257
180 281
210 257
240 199
270 108
300 -77
330 -408

KHSH-LP (radial/HAAT)
0 -205
30 -267
60 -531
90 -382
120 -92
150 74
180 177
210 188
240 179
270 359
300 383
330 170

So, if we were to use the maximum HAAT KJVA-LP's HAAT would be adjusted to 281 meters HAAT and KHSH-LP would be adjusted to 383 meters HAAT.  If we applied the 5.6 km service contour to these HAATs, KJVA-LP would be authorized 2 watts ERP and KHSH-LP, 1 watt ERP.  Even at those levels, there would still be contour overlap under the translator and NCE rules.  But under the current rules, these stations have service contours that rival full power Class A stations in some directions.

LPFM was created to be located on low-level sites at schools and the buildings of non-profit organizations in neighborhoods.  The design of the rules never anticipated mountaintop sites.  Even for low-level sites, the current method of using HAAT is not efficicent because it does not take into consideration most of the terrain inside the station's protected service contour. 

I hope there is a resolution to this matter.  Perhaps a voluntary time share which can be done even without the FCC's blessing as the two stations are not mutually exclusive.  If the two stations would agree to operate exactly 12 hours per day (no less or else it counters the rules for potential time share challenges), this could potentially work out.  KHSH is already on a time share with even another station.  

In the big picture, we need to rethink these rules as they do not take terrain into consideration.   For now, we hope these two groups could reach a plan to allow everyone to share the spectrum.  I will be more than happy to mediate such a proposal.   Please let me know!

Michelle Bradley
Founder
REC Networks

 

REC Essentials

  • FCC.TODAY
  • FCCdata.org
  • myLPFM Station Management
  • REC site map

The More You Know...

  • Unlicensed Broadcasting
  • Class D Stations for Alaska
  • Broadcasting in Japan
  • Our Jingles

Other REC sites

  • J1 Radio
  • REC Delmarva FM
  • Japan Earthquake Information
  • API for developers

But wait, there's more!

  • Join NFCB
  • Pacifica Network
  • LPFM Wiki
  • Report a bug with an REC system

Copyright © REC Networks - All Rights Reserved
EU cookie policy

Please show your support by using the Ko-Fi link at the bottom of the page. Thank you for supporting REC's efforts!